Friday, 15 November 2013

Japan finds beauty in renewable energy

I've always been a huge  fan of innovation in all its forms and the Japanese do things on such a grand scale and that's especially true of infrastructure projects. This most recent development is a direct result of solutions having to be found after Fukushima.

However there are other stunning examples of these projects that simply wouldn't be undertaken in other developed democracies. For example if you look at the sheer scale of the storm drain system that they have created in Tokyo.   Stunning and truly beautiful.

Wednesday, 6 November 2013

To listen, or to consume?

In this digital revolution we are all living through it is arguable that the area of our lives in which it has had the most consistently personal impact is on the music we ‘listen to’. From burning CDs, to using Napster, to using iPods, to switching to iTunes, to discovering new music with Shazam, to watching music on YouTube, to switching from iTunes to Spotify, to watching Radio 1 on your phone. In the space of a decade, the way we consume music has drastically changed.

'Consume' is an important word in this context, because in the past few years the concept of the pop song and the pop star has morphed. In mid-2012 the world was introduced to Psy, the star that fronted Gangnam style. The video is still the only one on YouTube to have reached 1 billion views and by the turn of the year it is likely to have reached 2 billion. Importantly this track was only (initially) released online, backed by a highly sophisticated marketing campaign from Korean media company YG Entertainment. The company made sure all the ingredients for success were right before they released. 1) They had built a huge database of warm users that were likely to spread the video. 2) The video was designed to specifically combine child-friendly colours, with major Korean stars, a major Asian meme from the Korean arm of the ‘got talent’ franchise and careful blend of comedy. 3) They had a scalable viral escalation strategy to push the content out of the Asian market and into the US and Europe. This recipe was spot on and for one year only, Psy became the biggest thing on the web.

The K-Pop model
Gangnam Style is an important part of the visual music story because YG Entertainment has used it to push out the company’s K-Pop content into the US market. Most notably so far was at Sunday’s Youtube music awards, an American based show, but with a huge global remit. The ‘surprise’ winner of the night was Girl’s Generation for ‘video of the year’ with ‘I got a boy’. Of course ‘surprise’ winner is far from the correct description. This was a win constructed in Korea by a company that gets how music works now. Their stated objective of pushing into the US is now paying off in a massive way by hooking into how the web works and how youth audiences access content.

The Youtube music awards themselves were an interesting phenomenon. Chaotic, completely different, streamed not broadcast, live and raw. Mainstream media outlets found it confusing and unexpected. The internet found it hard to understand. However, its mixture of live performance, live recording, anarchy and its unscripted nature are a perfect fit for the internet’s visual music age; one where everyone is searching for the next big thing and the next phenomenon.

Changing the music industry revenue model
This transformation is being felt most severely by the mainstream record industry. The writing has been on the wall for a long time with a slow decline in sales, but in the past few months, recorded album sales have plummeted off a cliff. This is at the same time as iTunes revenues down for the first time ever, but rental models such as Spotify are soaring. Services such as Spotify challenge the ownership paradigm fundamentally. After all, why would you own anything when you can simply rent it? Actually, that may be the internal conversation that the older demographic is having. The younger demographic for the longest time have been saying why would we pay anything at all? The music industry took a long time to understand the non-payment mindset. However, after a long period of adjustment, the mechanism has been put in place to ensure that Youtube ad revenue sharing and Spotify licensing costs now more than compensate for the loss in revenues from record sales, so much so that 2013 revenues on recorded music in the UK will increase for the first time in eight years.

That non-payment argument is no better illustrated than when you start to look at the nature of today’s pop stars and their multi-platform existence. If we take a look back at that album sales data from last week again, at number 1 we have Katy Perry selling a paltry 300,000 units in her first week of release. Conversely however, her Twitter following since the release of Prism has shot through the roof to make her the most followed person on the planet with over 45 million people tracking her every 140 character movement. Look further down the list of sales and we find Miley Cyrus with a mere 45,000 units shifted, yet she is the most searched for celebrity on the planet thanks to her twerking at the VMAs and the subsequent release of the controversial wrecking ball video, a video with a quarter of a billion views. And it is with Cyrus we complete the loop. Her transformation has everything to do with consumption and very little to do with music. Her reimagining as Disney Princess turned bad, is a direct result of the way that the market accesses internet content today and that trajectory looks set to continue.

Wednesday, 23 October 2013

The importance of integrated social media strategy

Two incidents in the past week have highlighted the dangers of businesses treating social media as a stand-alone communication channel that sits separately from the company’s core business.

The first will no doubt become a classic PR case study. On the day that British Gas chose to announce significant fuel price rises, its PR department went ahead with a planned Twitter Chat, hashtagged '#askBG'. The team had billed it as an opportunity to ask questions of the Customer Services Director, Bert Pijls. The timing simply couldn’t have been worse. The twitter storm that ensued was huge, as disgruntled consumers used the opportunity to post tweets such as:

"Hi Bert, which items of furniture do you, in your humble opinion, think people should burn first this winter? #ask BG"

The hashtag trended globally and ended up on the front page of the Guardian, The Times and The Telegraph. Similarly yesterday Ryan Air’s ‘larger than life’ CEO Michael O’Leary, took to Twitter for another live Q&A. The idea was that passengers could post questions to the airline’s boss, using the hashtag '#GrillMOL'. However the CEO seemed unaware that his inappropriate response to one of the first questioners – a woman – would be seen by everyone. His comment (“Nice pic. Phwoaaarr! MOL”) was rapidly re-tweeted and from there he was back-pedalling.

It could be argued that O’Leary’s combative entrance onto Twitter is simply another extension of the brand ‘that everyone loves to hate’. However it was his clear lack of understanding of the platform that suggested this was a mere add-on activity.

Both cases highlight how social media, despite its increasing importance to a brand’s overall presence, is still underestimated in terms of its reach, impact and how consumers use it. In order to use social effectively, those that are handling the platforms have to be ready to answer questions about every part of the business. Social is not a channel that can be controlled. Customers will use it to talk to brands about everything, so the message has to be plan, plan and plan some more. By ensuring that social is at the heart of every big announcement and each small detail, brands can use it as an incredibly effective customer engagement tool.

Tuesday, 8 October 2013

Will Twitter's IPO shrink the size of the accessible web?

Twitter's recent IPO announcement is the latest in a number of high profile public offerings from social media giants. It follows the mega IPOs of Facebook and LinkedIn and also comes in the wake of other socially connected companies' public offerings, such as Zynga and Groupon.

It is an indication of just how important these platforms have become, not just to the web, but to the whole of society, that they are valued so highly and get such huge media attention. However, there is an argument to say that as they all cease to be independent, that we all start to miss out.

The filter bubble

In 2011 Eli Pariser wrote 'The filter bubble'. The book outlines his theory that the more we use the web, the less rich and varied our experience becomes. He argued that because of the way web software learns how you behave and what content you consume, that in fact, as you use it more you are less likely to encounter a contrarian view. That's because you are simply served content through search and social interactions that fit with a profile you create daily and increasingly polarises you.

This is particularly noticeable if you use Google as your primary search engine. Google's algorithm ensures you receive personalised results. On one hand this is great as you tend to get the stuff you want, but it also means increasingly you only see content you are likely to agree with and therefore are less likely to question certain 'truths'.

The Twitter bubble

With Twitter the bubble is slightly different. The way a user builds their Twitter profile shapes what content they see in their stream. The people you follow, the key words you use in your biography and the hashtags you follow, all help to shape the content you see, but also arguably, limit the content you are exposed to over time.

The Twitter IPO makes this phenomenon even more interesting. A lot of coverage in the past few weeks has focused around the fact that Twitter hasn't been profitable. Twitter are laying out plans for a whole host of commercial growth options, including greater integration with TV, increasing levels of tweet data mining, and of course more advertising.

Up until now it's been in Twitter's interest as a network to be as open as it possibly can be, but the commercial imperative that will be visited upon the company following its sale will inevitably force the platform into highly specific targeting around a whole number of commercial propositions. That will mean that the user's experience of it will inevitably become narrower and less eclectic leading to a further narrowing of experience.

Keeping the web open and democractic

It's worth noting that 20 years after the open, democratic web was born, it is possibly one of the most monopolised places you could visit. In all areas choices are narrowing. Consider the fact that increasingly there is one place to look for things (Google), one place to shop for new goods (Amazon), one place to sell things (Ebay), a couple of places to talk to your mates (Facebook and Twitter). That level of monopoly simply won't be good for business in the long term. It simply means there is increasing control over the channels to market and ultimately the price at which that channel can be sold. It's important that companies consider all available channels to ensure the web continues to be an open marketplace.

Wednesday, 25 September 2013

Advisers are doing it for themselves

Last Tuesday saw the launch of Advisertech a new online and social media self-help platform set up by Pete Matthew MD at Jacksons Wealth.

Pete has been highly active in the social media space for around 5 years now, across a number of online channels, most notably on Twitter and Linked In which he uses to spread not only his own opinion but also the content of his financial education .tv site Meaningful Money. Meaningful Money is an online information platform delivered by video and podcast that he set up a few years ago to educate the general public about financial services and everything they needed to know about financial products.

The channel has been a huge success, increasingly driving new business for Jacksons and also landing Pete with industry accolades, including the Professional Adviser Financial Education award in 2011. After 3 years of success Pete has now made the decision to share some of the secrets of his success and believes any adviser can create the same things as he has.

Advisertech is another education platform, but this time set up to educate Pete’s adviser peers in creating a great online presence. A few months ago he posted about his social media philosophy it’s a simple personally focussed theory that seems to work incredibly well for him, but importantly it’s a philosophy that extends into the way he is offering up Advisertech. The interesting paragraph to note in Pete’s post is the following ‘Now if you’re a big corporate, with shareholders to please and lawyers to placate, you may well benefit from some of these things [social media strategy, plan and KPIs], but this is why most big companies suck at social.’ Although in many cases he’s absolutely correct in reality you don’t necessarily have to adhere to those things if you're a large corporate. After all what’s the strategy and KPIs behind a telephone? Is it that different?

While many financial services companies sit and wait on social media activation especially in the B2B space, the adviser community is happily looking after itself and supporting itself just like Pete and in the meantime the providers become more and more remote from the conversations, many of which are about them. Surely there is real danger in not communicating on social media rather than communicating.

Wednesday, 28 August 2013

Transforming the delivery of printed news

A couple of weeks ago there was the rather surprise announcement that Jeff Bezos (the Amazon founder and CRO) was buying the Washington Post. It was a purchase he made with his own considerable fortune and not as an Amazon acquisition. A move that removed the issue of how to integrate a loss-making business, into a business in which shareholders were increasingly keen to see an improvement in short-term profits.

The question that seemed to be on the majority of commentators minds was 'Why'? The newspaper business has been gradually disappearing down the sink hole for years, printed paper sales have been slowly shrinking and there are question marks over how successful the online subscription paywall has been for organisations that have introduced it. So why would one of the world's foremost web entrepreneurs have an interest?

Bezos has always been up for a challenge. He built Amazon for a start, launched the Kindle which now eclipses printed book sales. On top of that he is currently building a commercial space travel business, is raising Apollo rockets from the bottom of the ocean and attempting to build a clock that will last 10,000 years. He is not a man lacking ambition.

There has been conjecture that the purchase is merely a way of lobbying congress, or that it will allow him to control the agenda around Amazon's alleged tax avoidance. Those viewpoints can't be ignored, however there is a sound argument to say that he could be simply attempting to conquer the delivery of content online. He has already bought a stake in the Business Insider an online news property and far from trying to strip the asset, he actually invested in the quality of the title as Andrea Peterson writes in her Washington Post article:

“You might have heard that Jeff Bezos just bought us. So what does that mean for our pursuit of journalism? Taking a look at what happened to Business Insider earlier this year is a good start. Bezos joined in with the business news site’s owners to invest $5 million into building up its news and editorial operations.”

So reduction in journalistic integrity doesn’t seem likely, which means what he is most likely to bring is technical know-how. As Mike Ananny, Professor at The Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, states "Amazon is really a technology infrastructure company". Ananny is spot on. Amazon’s online recommendation facility is second to none and could prove invaluable to an online news property delivering relevant content to a reader. What Bezos could therefore bring, is that core customer experience, which may make the building of more customised content experiences a more straightforward process. In turn that means he could potentially look to develop a paid content model that more accurately reflects Netflix or iTunes, than the blanket paywall blockade adopted by publishers such as News UK (formerly News International).

Ananny again states "You can take a lot of the friction-removing processes Amazon has mastered over the years and apply them to news. How do you buy a digital subscription? How do you do a vacation-hold? How do you save stories? How do you share stories? But also how do we actually read things -- how is it customised on the fly?"

This acquisition is an incredibly interesting move in terms of the future of content delivery and if a new paid content model is established it could prove invaluable to advertisers who are likely to be very keen to deliver customised messages to extremely targeted audience segments. Whatever happens as The Verge puts it “… there's going to be a huge collision between classic journalism and stunning technology.”

Monday, 24 June 2013

Short form video gets traction

When Twitter introduced Vine, the six second video format, last year, it was met with a rather muted reaction. After the inevitable flurry of sign ups and people starting to use it, interest seemed to drop off. Other than some mildly engaging stop motion videos there seemed little real utility for it as a medium and indeed, as many pointed out, short-form video had existed in conjunction with Twitter for years with services like Twitvid.

Interestingly though in the last couple of months it's seen a gradual emergence as people have got to grips with it. It's been used to great comic effect with 'Ryan Gosling won't eat his cereal', but more significantly from a marketing perspective the DIY brand Lowe has found a quite brilliant use for it to publish 6 second home maintenance master classes and suddenly Vine seems to be popping up all over Twitter as part of different brands' Twitter content strategies.

Then last Thursday the short-form video sharing space hotted up. Instagram, the Facebook owned photo sharing network, launched a short-form format. Users can record up to 15 seconds, 9 seconds more than Vine, it has 13 custom filters, and users have the ability to select their own thumbnail as well. Instagram usage figures are huge, with 16 billion photos posted and with 1 billion likes a day, so it wasn't surprising that hours after the Instagram launch Twitter started to send emails to its user base promoting Vine. The launch is undoubtedly a direct attack on Vine and Instagram's much broader range of usage and customisation could prove, yet again, that first mover advantage is not all it’s cracked up to be.

Wednesday, 22 May 2013

We should be building great things that don’t exist

Since Steve Jobs became seriously ill the tech community has been looking for a replacement for his mercurial presentation style. In Larry Page they have probably found him. Page is by no means a new kid on the block, but his key note at Google I/O last week prompted the same sort of fanboy enthusiasm that Jobs inspired at Apple.

That fanboy enthusiasm however, has to be based on some serious innovation and that is what Page was able to cover in his keynote last week. There were numerous announcements, but the standouts from a marketing perspective were the newly enriched Google Maps and Google Play music service that will have Spotify seriously worried and the newly updated and enriched Google+.

What came through, time after time, was that here was a company that don't just talk about big data but use it in a way no other company on earth is. That's why Larry Page's pronouncement that “we should be building great things that don’t exist" rang so true.

There is great cause to be nervous about the level of data that Google holds (especially personal), but there is no doubt that they are using that data in amazing ways. None more so than Google Maps, which has become richer and richer almost every quarter since its launch. The product is now marrying the mapping data, 3d capabilities of Google Earth and the smart functionality of its reviews and location services to provide an almost game-like real-world view of an enormous cross section of the world.

Whatever the concerns continue to be about the way Google operate, there is no doubt that they are creating and will continue to create great innovative product.

Friday, 10 May 2013

The rise and rise of YouTube

YouTube is an odd beast, just eight years old, Google owned and so much a part of the fabric of the web that sometimes it gets overlooked as a social network. Yet the site continues to be a phenomenon, hitting almost no speed bumps on its inexorable journey to the top. It is completely peerless and somehow seems to dodge the ire that is directed squarely at its parent company.
  • More than 1 billion unique users visit YouTube each month
  • Over 4 billion hours of video are watched each month on YouTube
  • 72 hours of video are uploaded to YouTube every minute
  • YouTube is localised in 53 countries and across 61 languages
  • In 2011, YouTube had more than 1 trillion views, or around 140 views for every person on Earth
  • Find more stats about Youtube here
So with this enormous rise in usage it comes as no surprise that YouTube has announced a pilot channel subscription scheme, starting out with channels such as Sesame Street and National Geographic signing up to show full episodes.

The announcement has been inevitable since the rise of online streaming services such as HULU and Netflix. With Google's vast infrastructure and the channel embeds that come with a huge range of newly purchased televisions it signals an end to the divide between TV and the Internet. It means any content, on any device, anywhere.

Friday, 26 April 2013

Is Facebook 'Home' what users want from a mobile experience?

Last week Mark Zuckerberg introduced the world to 'Home' it's a product that sees Facebook finally get to grips with the shift to mobile platform access, something that analysts  have been looking for ever since the IPO.

So what is it?
Facebook 'home' is an application that will effectively take over the home screen of the user's smartphone – so long as you have an android phone. The product will operate with devices with Android 4 and above only. Zuckerberg stated that this will put a user’s personal interactions at the heart of their mobile experience.
The launch is a bold move, but it's something that as The Register points out, mobile operators have been attempting to do for over a decade with absolutely no success. The issue that the operators have faced is that they've always approached it from the company's revenue generation opportunity rather than from what a user wants from their experience. That means it’s always fallen short with the handset manufacturers.
Is Facebook the Internet?
This user first positioning is where the Facebook play could be so smart. Many argue, probably correctly, that each user is effectively the Facebook product. In reality however, to many users Facebook is the Internet, it's where they go first and where they get a huge amount of their information. So, having it as the homescreen will make sense to a huge proportion of the Facebook community. In July last year the users accessing Facebook via mobile was 543m well over half the base.
Add to that that the amount of time spent on Facebook (estimated at 1 in 7 of all internet minutes) and this adds up to a huge opportunity to launch those users straight into the Facebook environment.
What about our privacy?
There have been deep concerns expressed around the impact on privacy, with many feeling this will simply provide Facebook with the data to track a user’s every finger movement as well as their actual geographical movement. The other obvious objection is regarding the 'user as a product' argument. Home provides a platform for advertisers to place ads directly on to the home screen. This has the potential for users to become hugely disgruntled and advertisers are warning that ads must not intrude on user's experience.
The product launched last Friday and we'll see whether Adam Moressi (Facebook product designer) is correct in building an app that is "...trying to do is shift people's focus away from tasks and apps, and toward people". Or whether Charles Golvin, an analyst at Forrester Research, is correct in his assessment that "Facebook thinks it's more important to people than it actually is...for the vast majority of people, Facebook just isn't the be-all and end-all of their mobile experience," he said. "It's just one part."
In the meantime you can take a look at what happened when The Verge took it for a trial run.

Monday, 25 March 2013

"The future is (nearly) here and it's idiotic"

Sometime during the controversial launch of the Samsung S4 smartphone last week I picked up the following tweet, 'Eye scrolling. The future is (nearly) here and it’s idiotic' The tweet related to the innovation within the new Samsung smartphone that means that the interface will now track your eye movements and automatically scroll accordingly. The smartphone has been greeted with mixed reactions, from the tweet above, to some with a slightly warmer embrace LG certainly are taking issue with it, as they feel it may be infringing their patent.

A step too far?
The negative reaction does however engender some questions about the pace of innovation. In a recent discussion with an executive at Imagination Technology the computer chip technology manufacturers that help drive the graphics for mobile devices like the iPhone and tablet computers, he stated that we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg in terms of technology roll out and that there was an innovation roadmap that went on for years. When we put it to him that this might simply not fit with what consumers actually want he replied 'What are we supposed to do? Stop innovating?' It’s a fair point, but something makes us feel we may be hitting a crossroads.

Unwanted innovation
A couple of weeks ago I wrote about Google Glass and on-wrist technology being developed by Apple and indeed Samsung. While these products play well in geekier circles the noise from the average citizen seems to suggest that people just 'won't want it' and as these innovation announcements become more mainstream news there seems to be an increasing backlash. So how should we be approaching new innovation?

There is a tendency in industry to chase the 'new'. But with the new coming like a tsunami and from every angle, business' ability to use it to its advantage is gradually being eroded. Indeed, if we are to assume that consumers are actually getting tired of constant 'new' perhaps it’s time to consolidate our thinking and start looking at pragmatic implementation of technologies so that people can better use what they already have. Let's make apps with a fantastic user experience. Let's make video that works on all platforms.Let’s make websites work on a mobile. In short let’s give people what they want to make their life easier, not what the technologists think might be cool.

Thursday, 7 March 2013

The future of mobile is wearable

There's been a lot written over the past few years about the future of mobile. Much of it has been accompanied by ‘Tomorrow's World’ type predictions. In the past year or so however, those predictions have started to gain real credibility. Two projects in particular have been making waves since Christmas.

Project Glass
Project Glass, something that Google gave us a view of in late 2011, has been gaining momentum; both in the rumour-stakes and seemingly in its route to commercial development. Since its first announcement, Sergey Brin has been seen out and about on the New York Subway wearing a pair. Soon after that this concept video was released outlining just what the capability of this wearable tech may be.

There has been understandable scepticism about whether the project is just a scam and if not, whether it's actually commercially viable. However, there is emergent chatter that suggests that not only are they likely to be 'relatively' affordable but that actually, they may be available within the year.

That timescale would be astonishing frankly. Whether the time frame is correct or not, the reality is, the project definitely seems to be on the way. What is certain, as Forbes points out, is that the controlled leaking is a master stroke of market pre-conditioning. What the public appetite is, is yet to be assessed properly, but some are speculating it could be something like this.

Last year Nike released the Fuel Band, a wearable interactive band that augments your exercise regime. With its rather nebulous Fuel Points system, Nike say it is able to help you monitor the level of exercise you are undertaking more efficiently and with seamless integration with your social profiles it is definitely the smartest and most human-integrated item in the emergent wrist band market.

More interestingly, it was rumoured that Sir Jonathan Ive of Apple had bought dozens of boxes of the devices to work out how he could make it better. He's already done it with the MP3 player, the smartphone and the tablet so when rumours of iWatch popped up there was understandable excitement.

The wrist seems to have been the obvious place for the phone to go, ever since David Hasselhoff started chatting to Kit. Given they appear to no longer be the darlings of the smartphone market it's probably time for Apple to zag, as the industry zigs its way through MWC 2013 and potentially launch a product later on in the year. If it happens, it would be the first significant announcement since Steve Jobs’ death and would most likely smooth the bumps in the share price that have emerged since disappointing iPhone and iPad sales in Q4 2012.

Wrist or face?
2014 could see the biggest battle fought over your face, or your wrist and ultimately maybe it’ll come down to what you’re most comfortable with, or maybe what looks cooler. At this very moment we’re going for Project Glass, but that’s probably because we know just that little bit more about it at the moment.